Skip to main content

Modi Government’s ‘Clarification’ on Tax Data Further Muddies the Demonetisation Waters

On 18th August, Ministry of Finance issued a clarificationabout number of tax payers added post-demonetisation, hoping to set at rest the confusion – and skepticism – that had resulted from four different numbers being quoted by the prime minister, the finance minister, the Economic Survey and the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Of course, these numbers of 56 lakhs, 5.4 lakhs, 91 lakhs and 33 lakhs as the new tax payers are quite confusing and perplexing. Finally the press release confessed that these numbers denote nothing but “different period and different type of taxpayers”. The maze that the Government has laid is literally tread for any factual unbiased analysis and comparison of these numbers. Even then, let me try to decode this puzzle. 



Number quoted in the Prime Minister’s Speech (56 lakhs)

First, let me first dissect the clarification given to the statement made by the Prime Minister. The clarification is as follows:

“The Prime Minister’s speech referred to the increase in number of e-filed Personal Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed from 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017 over the ITRs filed in corresponding period of earlier years. The data maintained by the IT Department shows that during 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017, 2.79 crore e-returnsof Individual taxpayers were received as against 2.23 crore e-returns received during 1st April, 2016 to 5th August, 2016. Thus, the additional ITRs received in 2017 works out to be 56 lakh. During the same period of 2015, 2.00 crore e-returns were received, meaning thereby, that in 2016, only 22 lakh (rounded off)) additional e-returns were received by the due date of filing. This data has already been put in public domain by CBDT’s Press Release dated 7th August, 2017.”
(Emphasis supplied)

First examine the Prime Minister's speech to see that exactly what he has said.

“The number of new taxpayers filing income tax returns from April 01 to August 05 is 56 lakhs while in the same period last year only 22 lakh filed the returns. In a way it has more than doubled. This is the result of our fight against black money.”

I am not seeing that anywhere in the above statement the Prime Minister is specifically comparing the e-returns as clarified by the Ministry of Finance, instead he is speaking about the new tax payers without qualifying them to e-returns. Also the CBDT press release dated 7th August mentioned in yesterday's press release is also not mentioning about e-returns.


This is the same press release, which was carried my most of the newspapers on 8th August with huge headlines showing that demonetisation finally earned a huge jump of 24% in the income tax returns. In my last blog post I dealt this issue in detail. As of now it is clarified that it is a comparison of the e-returns, hence let us compare the growth of e-filing for the last couple of years from the table provided in the Annual Report of the Finance Ministry (FY 2015-16, Page 228).


The Report explains that “Electronic filing of I-T returns over the internet picked up from AY 2006-07 and the number of returns filed electronically has risen from around 4 Lakh in Financial Year, 2006-07 to 341.73 Lakh in Financial Year 2014-15. In Financial Year, 2015-16, nearly 309.53 Lakh returns were received up to 31st December, 2015 as compared to 243.31 Lakh returns for same period in Financial Year 2014-15, representing a growth of around 27.22%.”

We can see from the above table that the growth of e-returns seen an year to year growth of 74%, 79%, 31% and 38.67%  during the last 4 financial years of Dr. Manmohan Singh’s UPA-2 (2010-2014). Now I leave to your judgment that whether the 25% hike in e-returns in last year, that too based on a selective period, can be attributed as something phenomenal!

Number quoted in the Economic Survey (5.4 lakhs)

This is the clarification given by Ministry of Finance about this number.

“The analysis given in Table-6 on page 22 of the Economic Survey (Vol.2) is based on the data for the period of 9th November to 31st March of 2016-17 and corresponding periods of last two financial years. Moreover, the growth in the number of taxpayers discussed in the Economic Survey is based on the number of new taxpayers assuming the previous year’s growth rate as the reference growth rate. On the other hand, the growth of Individual return-filers referred to in PM’s speech is with respect to new as well as old taxpayers. Thus, the data used in Economic Survey is different from data referred to in PM’s speech in respect of the period of filing as well as the type of taxpayers and the two are not comparable.”

This is one exercise done by Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Advisor, which can be close to the truth as far as the real growth in number of new tax payers are concerned. I have dealt this in detail in my last blog post. My take is if he has compared the new tax payers added during FY 2016-17 (80.7 lakhs) with the number added during FY 2014-15 (76.04 lakh), then the above number of 5.4 lakhs will further shrink!

Number quoted by the Finance Minister (91 lakhs)

The clarification by Ministry of Finance for this amazing number of 91 lakhs is as follows:

“The statement of the Finance Minister regarding addition of 91 lakh taxpayers to the tax-base referred to the total number of new returns filed during the entire financial year 2016-17 and therefore, it is neither comparable to the data in PM’s speech nor with the data in Economic Survey (different period and different type of taxpayers).” 

First of all most media reported that time, in unison that Finance Minister on May 17, 2017 then talked about the number of tax payers post demonetisation, not for the entire financial year as saying in the clarification now. This is evident from the news headlines of that day – Times of India, Huffinton Post, NDTV, Live Mint, New Indian Express, Deccan Chronicle, India Today & Zee News. – none of which the government controverted.

Another question is while the Economic Survey is speaking about the total number of tax payers for the entire financial year 2016-17 as 80.7 lakhs (See Para 1.85, Page 22, Economic Survey Vol.2) , then the new clarification of 91 lakhs pertaining to the same financial year does not hold water.  Both figures cannot be right!

Number given in the Rajya Sabha (33 lakhs)

Here it is clarified that total number of returns filed between 9.11.2016 to 31.03.2017 is 1.96 crores and it is compared with the same number of returns filed in the previous year during the same period, which comes to 1.63 crores. 

This growth too not something phenomenal when you compare the same period in earlier years. For data comparisons to be meaningful, we should look at the whole financial year rather than at data for a part of the year.

A final word

At the end of the day, there is only custodian for all income tax-related data and that is the CBDT. The board is the institution which has been providing these figures to the prime minister, the finance minister, the chief economic advisor, etc. Instead of waiting for all the data to come in and making a simple apples-with-apples comparison, why has it been throwing different numbers at the people? Is the idea to use data selectively in order to justify demonetiastion? This is the question that the CBDT must answer.

Popular posts from this blog

Decoding the Petrol tax

An infographic, explaining the retail selling price of petrol, was being circulated in the social media by IT cell of BJP. We are living in a world where even Government published data needs scrutiny, so how can a party led information be not scrutinized. So let's get to work. The infographic shows retail selling price of petrol in Delhi on 16/09/2017 is ₹70.48/ltr and the tax components shared between State and Union as: Delhi Government               = ₹27.44/ltr Central Government            = ₹12.46/ltr This prima facie creating an impression that Delhi enjoys more than double petrol tax compared with Centre. Firstly, the above claim is having a manifest arithmetical error. Simple addition of State VAT of  ₹14.98 with the purported central government share of excise duty ₹9.02 gives only  ₹24.00, not  ₹27.44 as depicted in the ...
Read more

Can't fool all the People all the Time

The latest claim made by the Government, in a series of alleged benefits from the demonetisation of November 2016, is the drastic reduction of cash-to-GDP ratio from 12% to 9%.  Our Prime Minister had made this claim w hile addressing the company secretaries at a programme to mark the golden jubilee year of Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) in Delhi on 4 October 2017. It is a moot question whether a lower Currency in Circulation-GDP (CIC-GDP) ratio is a sign of a more developed economy or not. Before venturing to find its answer, let us examine certain facts. Let us compare our CIC-GDP ratio from FY 2009-10. CIC-GDP ratio of 12.3% in 2009-10 seen a gradual reduction to 11.6% in 2013-14, when Dr. Manmohan Singh relinquished his office. Under the leadership of Shri. Narendra Modi, by 2015-16, it had shot up to 12.2%, and then witnessed a drastic, if disruptive, reduction to 8.8% in 2016-17.  Our Prime Minister conveniently overlooked or glossed ove...
Read more

Are we testing intelligently?

Today is the 48th day of the harshest lockdown of the world, implemented in India, beginning 24th March 2020, in an attempt to tame the COVID-19 growth. The third phase of the lockdown will end on 18th May, but no one is sure whether the Government will extend it further or not. There is no doubt that the lockdown has enabled the country to substantially curb the COVID-19 growth rate but the way the lockdown was imposed from the top without any deliberations with the State Governments resulted in chaos for millions of Indians. Even after 48 long days, there are no signs of flattening the infection or even in the foreseeable future, instead it is growing with a polynomial curve trajectory. This is quite worrying because many other countries that imposed an extended lockdown, similar to India, witnessed a drastic drop in the number of new cases. FICTIONAL PROJECTIONS On April 25, Niti Aayog member Dr. V.K. Paul, a retired professor at AIIMS, New Delhi claimed that th...
Read more

Nothing dramatic about the Direct Tax Collections!

In the early days of August, major news outlets carried headlines claiming huge growth of tax payers and tax collections, which they attributed to the positive outcomes of the demonetisation. I had done a detailed fact check of the above claim in an article in the wire . Couple of days back, media  reported, yet again, that revenue from the direct tax grew at 17.5% during Apr-Aug period, creating a perception that, there is a quantum leap in our tax collections. This needs to be analysed in detail to understand whether there is anything phenomenal about this growth or is this growth is following the current growth trend. This year’s union budget's target revenue collection was ₹9.80 lakh crores from direct tax, of which ₹5.39 lakh crores in corporate tax and ₹4.41 lakh crores in income tax. Meanwhile, the direct tax collected during Apr-Aug period is ₹2.24 lakh crores, which is 22.9% of the budget target of direct tax. During the same period last year, ₹1.89 l...
Read more